4.6 Article

Exploration of binding of bisphenol A and its analogues with calf thymus DNA by optical spectroscopic and molecular docking methods

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.04.029

关键词

Bisphenols; DNA; Spectrum; Molecular modeling; Binding mode

资金

  1. Fund for the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21201147]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012671]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection [JLCBE11008]
  4. Jiangsu Fundament of Qilan Project
  5. Jiangsu Overseas Research & Training Program for University Prominent Young & Middle-aged Teachers and Presidents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenol A and its analogues have carcinogenic potentials and toxicities. However, there are lacks of studies elucidating gene toxic interactions of bisphenols with DNA. In this work, the binding modes of five bisphenol compounds with calf thymus DNA were characterized. The multi-spectroscopic experimental results indicated that the fluorescence quenching of bisphenols by calf thymus DNA point to groove binding. The ultraviolet visible and circular dichroism spectral data displayed that bisphenols partly induced conformational changes of calf thymus DNA. In addition, the binding constants of bisphenol A, diphenolic acid, bisphenol AF, bisphenol AP, bisphenol fluorine with calf thymus DNA obtained from fluorescence emission spectra were 1.09 x 10(4), 3.65 x 10(4), 4.46 x 10(4), 1.69 x 10(4), 4.49 x 10(4) L mol(-1) at 298.15 K, which indicated that the multi-noncovalent binding forces were involved in the binding processes. In silica investigations indicated that DNA has the preferable binding sites binding with bisphenols by minor groove binding and electrons transfer from DNA bases to bisphenols occurred. In addition, the structural differences of these five bisphenols partly affected the binding ability of them with DNA. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据