4.5 Article

Generation of Rodent Malaria Parasites with a High Mutation Rate by Destructing Proofreading Activity of DNA Polymerase δ

期刊

DNA RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 439-446

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsu009

关键词

mutator; Plasmodium; DNA polymerase delta; genome sequencing

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [18073013, 24112705, 24117504]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences [22406012, 23659211, 24590501, 24790401]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [H23-Shinkosaiko-ippan-014]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24117504, 23659211, 24790401, 24112705, 22406012, 25670226, 24590501] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium falciparum malaria imposes a serious public health concern throughout the tropics. Although genetic tools are principally important to fully investigate malaria parasites, currently available forward and reverse tools are fairly limited. It is expected that parasites with a high mutation rate can readily acquire novel phenotypes/traits; however, they remain an untapped tool for malaria biology. Here, we generated a mutator malaria parasite (hereinafter called a 'malaria mutator'), using site-directed mutagenesis and gene transfection techniques. A mutator Plasmodium berghei line with a defective proofreading 3' -> 5' exonuclease activity in DNA polymerase delta (referred to as PbMut) and a control P. berghei line with wild-type DNA polymerase d (referred to as PbCtl) were maintained by weekly passage in ddY mice for 122 weeks. High-throughput genome sequencing analysis revealed that two PbMut lines had 175-178 mutations and a 86- to 90-fold higher mutation rate than that of a PbCtl line. PbMut, PbCtl, and their parent strain, PbWT, showed similar course of infection. Interestingly, PbMut lost the ability to form gametocytes during serial passages. We believe that the malaria mutator system could provide a novel and useful tool to investigate malaria biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据