4.5 Article

Kinetics of the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Lobeglitazone, a Novel Activator of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma in Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 3049-3059

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24378

关键词

pharmacokinetics; ADME; transporters; CYP enzymes; P-glycoprotein; microsomal stability

资金

  1. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A100096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was performed to determine biopharmaceutical properties of lobeglitazone (LB), a novel thiazolidinedione-based activator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, in rats. In parallel artificial membrane permeability assay and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell permeability assays of LB, the activator was found to interact with multidrug-resistance protein 1 (MDR1) and OATP1B1. The concentration resulting in 50% inhibition value for LB in MDR1 expressing MDCK cells was approximately 12.5 +/- 3.61 M. LB had adequate stability (i.e., 56% remaining at 0.5 h) in rat liver microsomes. A cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitory potency study indicated that LB is primarily interacted with CYP1A2, 2C9, and 2C19. In rats, LB appeared to be readily absorbed after an oral administration (an absolute bioavailability of approximate to 95%). Following intravenous administration, LB exhibited linear pharmacokinetics in the dose range of 0.5-2 mg/kg. The primary distribution site was the liver but it was also distributed to heart, lungs, and fat tissue. The excretion of LB to the urine, bile, feces, and intestine was insignificant (i.e., <10% of the dose) in rats. These observations suggest that, despite the fact that it interacts with some drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes, the pharmacokinetics of LB were linear with a high oral bioavailability. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 104:3049-3059, 2015

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据