4.3 Article

Multimerization domains are associated with apparent strand exchange activity in BLM and WRN DNA helicases

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 137-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.07.015

关键词

DNA helicase; DNA recombination; Genomic instability; DNA strand exchange; Protein nucleic acid interaction; Yeast genetics

资金

  1. NIH grants [R01 GM071268, R01 GM101613]
  2. Busch Biomedical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BLM and WRN are members of the RecQ family of DNA helicases that act to suppress genome instability and cancer predisposition. In addition to a RecQ helicase domain, each of these proteins contains an N-terminal domain of approximately 500 amino acids (aa) that is incompletely characterized. Previously, we showed that the N-terminus of Sgs1, the yeast ortholog of BLM, contains a physiologically important 200 aa domain (Sgs1(103-322)) that displays single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding, strand annealing (SA), and apparent strand-exchange (SE) activities in vitro. Here we used a genetic assay to search for heterologous proteins that could functionally replace this domain of Sgs1 in vivo. In contrast to Rad59, the oligomeric Rad52 protein provided in vivo complementation, suggesting that multimerization is functionally important. An N-terminal domain of WRN was also identified that could replace Sgs1(103-322) in yeast. This domain, WRN235-526, contains a known coiled coil and displays the same SA and SE activities as Sgs1(103-322). The coiled coil domain of WRN235-526 is required for both its in vivo activity and its in vitro SE activity. Based on this result, a potential coiled coil was identified within Sgs1(103-322). This 25 amino acid region was similarly essential for wt Sgs1 activity in vivo and was replaceable by a heterologous coiled coil. Taken together, the results indicate that a coiled coil and a closely linked apparent SE activity are conserved features of the BLM and WRN DNA helicases. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据