4.3 Article

Extracts of proliferating and non-proliferating human cells display different base excision pathways and repair fidelity

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 834-843

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.002

关键词

Base excision repair; Short-patch; Long-patch; BER fidelity

资金

  1. European Community [LSHG-CT-2005-512113]
  2. The Norwegian Cancer Society
  3. The Cancer Fund at St. Olavs Hospital
  4. The Svanhild and Arne Must Fund for Medical Research
  5. National Programme for Research in Functional Genomics in Norway (FUGE)
  6. Norwegian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Base excision repair (BER) of damaged or inappropriate bases in DNA has been reported to take place by single nucleotide insertion or through incorporation of several nucleotides, termed short-patch and long-patch repair, respectively. We found that extracts from proliferating and non-proliferating cells both had capacity for single- and two-nucleotide insertion BER activity. However, patch size longer than two nucleotides was only detected in extracts from proliferating cells. Relative to extracts from proliferating cells, extracts from non-proliferating cells had approximately two-fold higher concentration of POL beta, which contributed to most of two-nucleotide insertion BER. In contrast, two-nucleotide insertion in extracts from proliferating cells was not dependent on POL beta. BER fidelity was two- to three-fold lower in extracts from the non-proliferating compared with extracts of proliferating cells. Furthermore, although one-nucleotide deletion was the predominant type of repair error in both extracts, the pattern of repair errors was somewhat different. These results establish two-nucleotide patch BER as a distinct POL beta-dependent mechanism in non-proliferating cells and demonstrate that BER fidelity is lower in extracts from non-proliferating as compared with proliferating cells. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据