4.5 Article

Development of a Convenient ex vivo Model for the Study of the Transcorneal Permeation of Drugs: Histological and Permeability Evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 63-71

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24231

关键词

in vitro model; permeability; drug transport; epithelial delivery; permeability; mucosal drug delivery; transcorneal; permselectivity; porcine cornea; ocular delivery

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research [PRIN2010H834LS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an ex vivo model for the study of the transcorneal permeation of drugs, based on porcine tissues, was evaluated. The setup is characterized by ease of realization, absence of O-2 and CO2 bubbling and low cost; additionally, the large availability of porcine tissue permits a high throughput. Histological images showed the comparability between porcine and human corneas and confirmed the effectiveness of the isolation procedure. A new de-epithelization procedure based on a thermal approach was also set up to simulate cornea permeability in pathological conditions. The procedure did not affect the integrity of the underlying layers and allowed the characterization of the barrier properties of epithelium and stroma. Six compounds with different physicochemical properties were tested: fluorescein, atenolol, propranolol, diclofenac, ganciclovir and lidocaine. The model highlighted the barrier function played by epithelium toward the diffusion of hydrophilic compounds and the permselectivity with regard to more lipophilic molecules. In particular, positively charged compounds showed a significantly higher transcorneal permeability than negatively charged compounds. The comparability of results with literature data supports the goodness and the robustness of the model, especially taking into account the behavior of fluorescein, which is generally considered a marker of tissue integrity. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 104:63-71, 2015

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据