4.7 Article

Conservation implications of divergent global patterns of ant and vertebrate diversity

期刊

DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 1084-1092

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12090

关键词

Ants; biodiversity patterns; conservation planning; genera; species richness; vertebrates

资金

  1. DOE-NICCR
  2. DOE-PER [DE-FG02-08ER64510]
  3. NASA Biodiversity Grant [ROSES-NNX09AK22G]
  4. NSF [NSF 0953390]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [0953390] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Global conservation planning is often oriented around vertebrates and plants, yet most organisms are invertebrates. To explore the potential conservation implications of this bias, we assessed how well patterns of diversity for an influential group of invertebrates, the ants, correspond with those of three vertebrate groups (birds, mammals and amphibians). Location Global. Methods We compiled data on the number of genera of ants and the three vertebrate groups for 370 political regions across the world. We then compared their correlations both for overall diversity and between subsets of genera likely to be of conservation concern. We also developed generalized additive models (GAM) to identify regions where vertebrates and ants diverged in their diversity patterns. Results While ant and vertebrate diversity do positively correlate, the correlations are substantially weaker for the ant lineages of the greatest conservation concern. Vertebrates also notably fail to predict ant diversity in specific geographic areas, including Australia and Southeast Asia, parts of Africa and Madagascar, and south-western China. These failures may be genuine differences in diversity patterns, or they may indicate important gaps in our knowledge of ant and vertebrate diversity. Main conclusions We conclude that it is currently unwise to assume that global conservation priorities based on vertebrates will conserve ants as well. We suspect that this also applies to other invertebrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据