4.6 Article

Probing the interaction of cefodizime with human serum albumin using multi-spectroscopic and molecular docking techniques

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.01.010

关键词

Cefodizime (CEF); Human serum albumin (HSA); Multi-spectroscopic techniques; Molecular modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21177163]
  2. 111Project [B08044]
  3. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health
  4. Minzu University of China [10301-01404026]
  5. First-class University First Class Academic Program of Minzu University of China [YLDX01013]
  6. Graduate Student Scientific Research Innovation Project of Minzu University of China [K2014042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To know the interaction of cefodizime (CEF) with human serum albumin (HSA), techniques of different spectroscopies and molecular modeling were used. The inner filter effects were eliminated to get accurate binding parameters. Steady state fluorescence suggested a static type for CEF-HSA interaction, and the complex formation had a high affinity of 10(5) Lmol(-1) On the basis of the thermodynamic results and site marker competitive experiments, it was considered that CEF was bound to site I (subdomain IIA) of HSA mainly by hydrogen bonds and van der Waals force. The calculated binding distance (r) indicated that the non-radioactive energy transfer came into being in the interaction between CEF and HSA. Furthermore, molecular modeling was applied to further define that CEF interacted with the Trp214, Lys199, Phe211, Leu238 residues of HSA. In addition, three-dimensional fluorescence and circular dichroism (CD) results showed that the binding of CEF can cause conformational and some microenvironmental changes of HSA. This paper provides reasonable models helping us further understand the transportation and distribution of CEF when it spreads into human blood serum which is of great importance in pharmacology and pharmacodynamics. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据