4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Infliximab in ulcerative colitis is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy

期刊

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
卷 51, 期 8, 页码 1202-1207

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9364-7

关键词

complications; ileal pouch; infliximab; restorative proctocolectomy; ulcerative colitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Little data exist regarding infliximab use in surgical decision making and postoperative complications in ulcerative colitis. Our goals were to determine the rate of postoperative complications in infliximab-treated ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy and to determine whether three-stage procedures are more often necessary. METHODS: We studied a group of infliximab-treated patients and matched control subjects who underwent two-stage restorative proctocolectomy between 2000 and 2006. Postoperative complications were compared. In addition, the rate of three-stage procedures was compared between all infliximab-and noninfliximab-treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 523 restorative proctocolectomies were performed. In the infliximab group, there were 46 two-stage and 39 three-stage procedures. Covariate-adjusted odds of early complication for the inflixmab group was 3.54 times that of controls (P = 0.004; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1.51-8.31). The odds of sepsis were 13.8 times greater (P = 0.011; 95 percent CI, 1.82-105) and the odds of late complication were 2.19 times greater (P = 0.08; 95 percent CI, 0.91-5.28) for infliximab. The odds of requirement for three-stage procedures was 2.07 times greater in the infliximab group (P = 0.011; 95 percent CI, 1.18-3.63). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab increases the risk of postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy and has altered the surgical approach to ulcerative colitis. Potential benefits of infliximab should be balanced against these risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据