4.2 Article

Adhesion dynamics of Flavobacterium columnare to channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus and zebrafish Danio rerio after immersion challenge

期刊

DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 221-227

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/dao02371

关键词

Adhesion; Columnaris disease; Flavobacterium columnare; Host-pathogen specificity

资金

  1. USDA-ARS/Auburn University
  2. USDA-ARS CRIS [6420-32000-022-00D]
  3. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station HATCH funds
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1051106] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adhesion dynamics of Flavobacterium columnare to fish tissues were evaluated in vivo by immersion challenge followed by bacterial plate count and confirmatory observations of gill-adhered bacterial cells using scanning electron microscopy. Adhesion of F. columnare genomovar I (ARS-1) and II (BGFS-27) strains to skin and gill of channel catfish Ictalurus punctactus and gill of zebrafish Danio rerio was compared. At 0.5 h post-challenge, both strains adhered to gill of channel catfish at comparable levels (10(6) colony forming units [CFU] g(-1)), but significant differences in adhesion were found later in the time course. Channel catfish was able to effectively reduce ARS-1 cells on gill, whereas BGFS-27 persisted in gill beyond the first 24 h post-challenge. No significant difference was found between both strains when adhered to skin, but adhered cell numbers were lower (10(3) CFU g(-1)) than those found in gill and were not detectable at 6 h post-challenge. Adhesion of BGFS-27 cells to gill of zebrafish also occurred at high numbers (>10(6) CFU g(-1)), while only <10(2) CFU g(-1) of ARS-1 cells were detected in this fish. The results of the present study show that particular strains of F. columnare exhibit different levels of specificity to their fish hosts and that adhesion to fish tissues is not sufficient to cause columnaris disease

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据