4.5 Article

A Drosophila model of mitochondrial disease caused by a complex I mutation that uncouples proton pumping from electron transfer

期刊

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 1165-1174

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.015321

关键词

Mitochondria; Drosophila; Mitochondrial disease; Respiratory chain; Leigh syndrome; Neurodegeneration

资金

  1. Parkinson Society Canada Research Fellowship
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research Fellowship
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Fellowship [F31NS071857]
  4. National Institute of Health [1RO1GM086394, 5R01GM104990]
  5. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  6. Genetic Approaches to Aging Training Grant [T32AG000057]
  7. NW Mitochondrial Guild Postdoctoral Fellowship
  8. University of Washington School of Medicine
  9. University of Washington Department of Pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations affecting mitochondrial complex I, a multi-subunit assembly that couples electron transfer to proton pumping, are the most frequent cause of heritable mitochondrial diseases. However, the mechanisms by which complex I dysfunction results in disease remain unclear. Here, we describe a Drosophila model of complex I deficiency caused by a homoplasmic mutation in the mitochondrial-DNA-encoded NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene. We show that ND2 mutants exhibit phenotypes that resemble symptoms of mitochondrial disease, including shortened lifespan, progressive neurodegeneration, diminished neural mitochondrial membrane potential and lower levels of neural ATP. Our biochemical studies of ND2 mutants reveal that complex I is unable to efficiently couple electron transfer to proton pumping. Thus, our study provides evidence that the ND2 subunit participates directly in the proton pumping mechanism of complex I. Together, our findings support the model that diminished respiratory chain activity, and consequent energy deficiency, are responsible for the pathogenesis of complex-I-associated neurodegeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据