4.2 Review

A systematic review of studies examining inflammation associated cytokines in human abdominal aortic aneurysm samples

期刊

DISEASE MARKERS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 181-188

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2009/352319

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health, USA [RO1 HL080010-01]
  2. NHMRC [540403/540404/540405, 431503/458505]
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL080010] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Inflammation is critical in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) but there is no current consensus on which inflammation related cytokines are important. The aim of this review was to systemically assess previous studies investigating the relative expression of inflammation associated cytokines within human AAA samples. Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for studies which simultaneously examined an array of different inflammation associated cytokines in aortic samples in order to identify those associated with AAA. Focused searches were then conducted for further studies assessing relative concentrations of these cytokines in aortic samples in relation to AAA. Appropriate studies were assessed by two reviewers independently. Results: Eighteen studies were included. A number of different cytokines have been consistently found to be upregulated within AAA by comparison to aortic samples removed from patients without cardiovascular disease, however findings relative to samples of aortic athero-thrombosis were less consistent. TNFA and INFG appear to be the most consistently associated with AAA in studies using both normal and atherosclerotic controls. Cautious interpretation of these data is recommended due to a number of methodological problems. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that TNFA and INFG are the most consistently upregulated cytokines in large AAAs. Further studies utilizing larger populations, new proteomic techniques and better patient matching are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据