4.2 Article

Detecting temporal and spatial effects of epithelial cancers with Raman spectroscopy

期刊

DISEASE MARKERS
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 323-337

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2008/230307

关键词

Raman spectroscopy; optical diagnosis; cervix; dysplasia; skin cancer; malignancy associated changes; field effect; raft cultures; spectral markers

资金

  1. NCI/NIH [R01-CA95405, R21-CA95995]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (pre-doctoral fellowship for MK)
  3. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  4. Tri-state Women's Health
  5. National Institute for Health Research [CSA/03/07/017] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA095995, R01CA095405] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial cancers, including those of the skin and cervix, are the most common type of cancers in humans. Many recent studies have attempted to use Raman spectroscopy to diagnose these cancers. In this paper, Raman spectral markers related to the temporal and spatial effects of cervical and skin cancers are examined through four separate but related studies. Results from a clinical cervix study show that previous disease has a significant effect on the Raman signatures of the cervix, which allow for near 100% classification for discriminating previous disease versus a true normal. A Raman microspectroscopy study showed that Raman can detect changes due to adjacent regions of dysplasia or HPV that cannot be detected histologically, while a clinical skin study showed that Raman spectra may be detecting malignancy associated changes in tissues surrounding nonmelanoma skin cancers. Finally, results of an organotypic raft culture study provided support for both the skin and the in vitro cervix results. These studies add to the growing body of evidence that optical spectroscopy, in this case Raman spectral markers, can be used to detect subtle temporal and spatial effects in tissue near cancerous sites that go otherwise undetected by conventional histology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据