4.5 Article

Study on the aging and critical carbon number of wax deposition with temperature for crude oils

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.03.026

关键词

wax deposition; aging; carbon number distribution; wax content; critical carbon number

资金

  1. Key National Science and Technology Specific Project [2011ZX05026-004-03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51104167]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0969]
  4. Henry Fok Foundation [142021]
  5. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China [201254]
  6. Beijing Youth Talent Program [YETP0679]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aging of wax deposition with time and temperature was investigated by a series of experiments using cold finger device and carbon number distribution of the deposit samples was analyzed by high temperature gas chromatography. Deposition experiments were performed with the waxy crude oils from oil field in China, containing 18.6 wt% wax content. In the process of wax deposition aging, wax molecules with carbon number higher than critical carbon number (CCN) would diffuse into the deposit, while those with carbon number less than CCN would diffuse out from the deposit during the experiments. In this study, it is found that the wax content and higher carbon number in deposit all increase as time increases from 3 h to 48 h, so the hardness of deposit increases during the aging of wax deposition. In addition, the higher temperature range has an active effect on the aging of the wax deposition. Comparing the effect of the different temperature conditions, it could be concluded that temperature differential mainly determines the wax content and that hardness of the deposit mainly depends on the bulk oil temperature. Moreover, in this study, it is found that the temperature has only a little effect on critical carbon number (CCN) as change in CCN does not exceed one carbon number under different temperature conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据