4.5 Review

A review of drillstring vibration modeling and suppression methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 150-164

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.030

关键词

drillstring vibration; coupled/uncoupled modes; boundary conditions; vibratibn suppression; vibration-assisted drilling; directional drilling

资金

  1. Husky Energy
  2. Suncor Energy
  3. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
  4. Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador [781-2636-1920044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drilling is one of the most costly and risky activities in oil and gas reservoir exploration and field development. A portion of this high cost is related to unwanted vibrations of the drillstring. With the advancement of Measurement While Drilling (MWD) tools and their real-time implementation, vibration models are still a valuable tool for pre-drilling analyses, designing the bottomhole assembly (BHA) and sensitivity analyses of the input parameters. In the last 70 years, a wide variety of models has been developed for design and analysis of drilling structures. Due to the complexity of downhole interactions and excitations a variety of modeling simplifications and assumptions is typically made. This paper presents a broad survey of the drillstring vibration modeling literature. The state-of-the-art of models for predicting axial, torsional and bending vibrations (uncoupled and coupled), boundary condition assumptions, equation formulation methods, and applications to vibration mitigation is reviewed. Moreover, the challenges of drillstring vibration modeling in the presence of modern drilling techniques such as deviated drilling and use of vibrating downhole tools are discussed. This survey is intended to organize and summarize the vast amount of literature in the field, and to aid engineers in both industry and academia in developing, choosing, or critically assessing the limitations of drillstring vibration models. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据