4.8 Article

Highly Conductive and Ultrastretchable Electric Circuits from Covered Yarns and Silver Nanowires

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 3887-3895

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn5070937

关键词

silver nanowires; composite fibers; twining spring configuration; stretchable electric circuits; implantable

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB932303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61301036]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [13ZR1463600, 13XD1403900]
  4. Innovation Project of Shanghai Institute of Ceramics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stretchable electronics, as a promising research frontier, has achieved progress in a variety of sophisticated applications. The realization of stretchable electronics frequently involves the demand for a stretchable conductor as an electrical circuit. However, it still remains a challenge to fabricate high-performance (working strain exceeding 200%) stretchable conductors. Here, we present for the first time a facile, cost-effective, and scalable method for manufacturing ultrastretchable composite fibers with a twining spring configuration: cotton fibers twining spirally around a polyurethane fiber. The composite fiber possesses a high conductivity up to 4018 S/cm, which remains as high as 688 S/cm at 500% tensile strain. In addition, the conductivity of the composite fiber (initial conductivity of 4018 S/cm) remains perfectly stable after 1000 bending events and levels off at 183 S/cm after 1000 cyclic stretching events of 200% strain. Stretchable LED arrays are integrated efficiently utilizing the composite fibers as a stretchable electric wiring system, demonstrating the potential applications in large-area stretchable electronics. The biocompatibility of the composite fiber is verified, opening up its prospects in the field of implantable devices. Our fabrication strategy is also versatile for the preparation of other specially functionalized composite fibers with superb stretchability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据