4.3 Article

Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 177-184

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0108

关键词

Germany; mode of birth; regional variation; VBAC; vaginal birth after caesarean section

资金

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [305208]
  2. OptiBIRTH study
  3. COST action [ISO907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Regional and interinstitutional variations have been recognized in the increasing incidence of caesarean section. Modes of birth after previous caesarean section vary widely, ranging from elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) and unplanned repeat caesarean section (URCS) after trial of labour to vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). This study describes interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after previous caesarean section in relation to regional indicators in Germany. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study using the birth registers of six maternity units (n = 12,060) in five different German states (n = 370,209). Indicators were tested by chi(2) and relative deviations from regional values were expressed as relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Results: The percentages of women in the six units with previous caesarean section ranged from 11.9% to 15.9% (P = 0.002). VBAC was planned for 36.0% to 49.8% (P = 0.003) of these women, but actually completed in only 26.2% to 32.8% (P = 0.66). Depending on the indicator, the units studied deviated from the regional data by up to 32% [relative risk 0.68 (0.47-0.97)] in respect of completed VBAC among all initiated VBAC. Conclusions: There is substantial interinstitutional variation in mode of birth following previous caesarean section. This variation is in addition to regional patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据