4.4 Article

Stroke family caregivers' support needs change across the care continuum: a qualitative study using the timing it right framework

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 315-324

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.691937

关键词

Caregiver; stroke; social support; education; health service delivery

资金

  1. Ministry of Health and Long-term Care
  2. CIHR Strategic Training Initiative in Health Care Technology and Place
  3. University of Toronto Mary Trimmer Chair in Geriatric Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Family caregivers provide essential support as stroke survivors' return to community living, but it is not standard clinical practice to prepare or provide ongoing support for their care-giving role. In addition, health care professionals (HCPs) experiences with providing support to caregivers have not been explored previously. The objectives of this qualitative study were to: (1) explore the support needs over time from the perspective of caregivers, (2) explore the support needs over time from the perspective of HCPs, and (3) compare and contrast caregivers' and HCPs' perspectives. Methods: A qualitative study with stroke family caregivers (n = 24) and HCPs (n = 14). In-depth interviews were audio taped, transcribed, and analyzed using Framework Analysis. Results: Three main themes emerged concerning: (1) types and intensity of support needed; (2) who provides support and the method of providing support; and (3) primary focus of care. These themes are discussed in relation to the TIR framework. Conclusions: Caregivers' needs for support and the individuals most suited to providing support change across the stroke survivor's recovery trajectory. Changes to service delivery to better support caregivers may include: (1) addressing caregivers' changing needs across the care continuum; (2) implementing a family-centered model of care; and (3) providing 7-day per week inpatient rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据