4.5 Article

Do endoscopic features suggesting eosinophilic esophagitis represent histological eosinophilia?

期刊

DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 156-163

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/den.12091

关键词

atopy; endoscopy; eosinophilic esophagitis; esophageal eosinophilia; histology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundEsophageal linear furrows, corrugated rings, and/or white exudates are often seen in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE); however, whether these are specific to EoE remains unclear. Endoscopic surveillance of these features was conducted to determine whether these represent esophageal eosinophilia, which is essential for the diagnosis of EoE. Patients and MethodsTwo thousand seven hundred and sixty-three patients were enrolled consecutively. Target biopsy was carried out when the above features were seen. Histological eosinophilia was defined as 24 or more eosinophils per high-power field (HPF). Associations between features and eosinophilia were analyzed statistically. ResultsTwo thousand five hundred and forty-five patients completed the study. Linear furrows, corrugated rings and white exudates were seen in 24, 15 and 45 patients, respectively. These findings somewhat overlapped. Among 58 biopsied patients withany of the above features, these features represented eosinophilia in 14% (3/21), 23% (3/13), and 5% (2/43), respectively. None of the 199 patients who received biopsy for other features had eosinophilia. Two of five eosinophilia patients were diagnosed with EoE. Multiple comparisons revealed that eosinophil counts in linear furrows and corrugated rings but not white exudates were significantly greater than those in other features (12, 9, 1, and <1 eosinophils/HPF on average, respectively). ConclusionsAn endoscopic feature suggesting EoE does not always represent esophageal eosinophilia and is non-specific for EoE, although it reminds endoscopists of the presence of EoE. The diagnostic utility of linear furrows or corrugated rings for esophageal eosinophilia is superior to that of white exudates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据