4.4 Article

Silencing of GATA6 Suppresses SW1990 Pancreatic Cancer Cell Growth In Vitro and Up-Regulates Reactive Oxygen Species

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 9, 页码 2518-2527

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2752-4

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; GATA6; Reactive oxygen species; RNA interference; Growth

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [815100890100013, 04009381]
  2. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [B2009066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of any gastrointestinal cancer with a mortality rate approaching its incidence. Previous studies have indicated that GATA6 plays a key role in organ development and function, and that abnormal expression of GATA6 may induce tumorigenesis. Meanwhile, it has been reported that generation of reactive oxygen species contributes to carcinogenesis. In this study, we set out to study the role of GATA6 expression on proliferation and apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells and the role of reactive oxygen species. Methods Four target miRNA sequences against GATA6 mRNA were synthesized and used to transfect SW1990 cells. Then, GATA6 expression in SW1990 cells was examined by western blot and quantative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cell proliferation was examined by WST-8 and colony formation assay. Cell cycle progression and apoptosis were measured by flow cytometry. We also measured the generation of reactive oxygen species by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. Results RNA interference against GATA6 successfully inhibited mRNA and protein expression of GATA6 in the SW1990 pancreatic cancer cell line. Silencing of GATA6 by RNA interference inhibited cell proliferation and increased apoptosis of SW1990, and enhanced the expression of reactive oxygen species. Conclusions These results suggest that the RNA interference approach against GATA6 may be an effective therapeutic approach for treatment of pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据