4.4 Article

Zinc Supplementation Modifies Tight Junctions and Alters Barrier Function of CACO-2 Human Intestinal Epithelial Layers

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 77-87

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2328-8

关键词

Zinc; CACO-2; Tight junction; Claudins; Paracellular; Nutrition; Claudin; Differentiation; Metallothionein

资金

  1. Sharpe-Strumia Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc deficiency is known to result in epithelial barrier leak in the GI tract. Precise effects of zinc on epithelial tight junctions (TJs) are only beginning to be described and understood. Along with nutritional regimens like methionine-restriction and compounds such as berberine, quercetin, indole, glutamine and rapamycin, zinc has the potential to function as a TJ modifier and selective enhancer of epithelial barrier function. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of zinc-supplementation on the TJs of a well-studied in vitro GI model, CACO-2 cells. Barrier function was assessed electrophysiologically by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (R-t), and radiochemically, by measuring transepithelial (paracellular) diffusion of C-14-D-mannitol and C-14-polyethyleneglycol. TJ composition was studied by Western immunoblot analyses of occludin, tricellulin and claudins-1 to -5 and -7. Fifty- and 100-mu M zinc concentrations (control medium is 2 mu M) significantly increase R-t but simultaneously increase paracellular leak to D-mannitol. Claudins 2 and 7 are downregulated in total cell lysates, while occludin, tricellulin and claudins-1, -3, -4 and -5 are unchanged. Claudins-2 and -7 as well as tricellulin exhibit decreased cytosolic content as a result of zinc supplementation. Zinc alters CACO-2 TJ composition and modifies TJ barrier function selectively. Zinc is one of a growing number of nutraceutical substances capable of enhancing epithelial barrier function, and may find use in countering TJ leakiness induced in various disease states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据