4.4 Article

Orally Administered Phosphatidic Acids and Lysophosphatidic Acids Ameliorate Aspirin-Induced Stomach Mucosal Injury in Mice

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 950-958

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2475-y

关键词

Lysophosphatidic acid; Phosphatidic acid; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcer; Phospholipase A(2); Dietary lipids

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan [21580141]
  2. Kiei-kai Research Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24580185, 21580141] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent investigations revealed that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a phospholipid with a growth factor-like activity, plays an important role in the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract epithelium. This paper attempts to clarify the effect of orally administered phosphatidic acid (PA) and LPA on aspirin-induced gastric lesions in mice. Phospholipids, a free fatty acid, a diacylglycerol and a triglyceride at 1 mM (5.7 mu mol/kg body weight) or 0.1 mM were orally administered to mice 0.5 h before oral administration of aspirin (1.7 mmol/kg). The total length of lesions formed on the stomach wall was measured as a lesion index. Formation of LPA from PA in the mouse stomach was examined by in vitro (in stomach lavage fluid), ex vivo (in an isolated stomach) and in vivo (in the stomach of a living mouse) examinations of phospholipase activity. Palmitic acid, dioleoyl-glycerol, olive oil and lysophosphatidylcholine did not affect the aspirin-induced lesions. In contrast, phosphatidylcholine (1 mM), LPA (1 mM) and PA (0.1, 1 mM) significantly reduced the lesion index. Evidence for formation of LPA from PA in the stomach by gastric phospholipase A(2) was obtained by in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo experiments. An LPA-specific receptor, LPA2, was found to be localized on the gastric surface-lining cells of mice. Pretreatment with PA-rich diets may prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced stomach ulcers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据