4.4 Review

Diabetes Mellitus and the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 1576-1585

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2055-1

关键词

Diabetes mellitus; Colorectal cancer; Risk; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Qing Lan Project
  2. 7th Six-Talent-Person-Peak Program, Jiangsu Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine whether diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Relevant studies were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE (up until November 1st, 2011). Inclusion criteria were original, peer-reviewed publications, with case-control and cohort studies (for studies on diabetes mellitus and colorectal cancer). Summary relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated with a random-effects model. Twenty-four studies including eight case-control and 16 cohort studies, with a total of 3,659,341 participants, were included in this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, and all involved diabetes mellitus and colorectal cancer risk. Meta-analysis of the 24 included studies indicated that diabetes was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, compared with no diabetes (summary RR of colorectal cancer incidence = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.20-1.31), without heterogeneity between studies (P (heterogeneity) = 0.296). Sub-group analyses found that these results were consistent between case-control and cohort studies and among studies conducted in different areas. The association between diabetes and colorectal cancer incidence did not differ significantly by sex and sub-sites. Insulin therapy was also positively associated with risk of colorectal cancer (summary RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.18-1.35), with evidence of heterogeneity between studies (P (heterogeneity) = 0.014). Our findings further support a relationship between diabetes and increased risk of colon and rectal cancer in both women and men, and insulin therapy for diabetes may increase this risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据