4.4 Article

Serum miR-18a: A Potential Marker for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 2910-2916

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2317-y

关键词

miR-18a; Carcinoma; Hepatocellular; Hepatitis B virus; Serum; Biomarker

资金

  1. Hospital Administration Center of Wuxi, China [YGZ1016, YGZ1106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alpha-fetoprotein detection is currently mainly used in clinic for diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its sensitivity and specificity are not satisfying. Approximately 60-80 % of patients with HCC have an established background of chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV). To investigate the potential of serum microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for HBV-related HCC. This study was divided into two phases: firstly, marker (miR-95, miR-18a, miR-10b, miR125a, and miR-378) detection by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in sera from HBV patients with HCC (n = 15) and health subject (n = 15); and, secondly, marker validation by real-time qRT-PCR on HBV patients with HCC (n = 86) or hepatitis or cirrhosis (n = 30), and healthy subject (n = 45). Serum miR-18a was significantly higher in HBV patients with HCC than healthy controls (p < 0.01); serum miR-378 was significantly lower in HBV patients with HCC compared to healthy control (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses suggested that serum miR-18a had significant diagnostic value for HBV-related HCC. MiR-18a yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of ROC of 0.881 with 86.1 % sensitivity and 75.0 % specificity in discriminating HBV-related HCC from healthy controls, and an AUC of ROC of 0.775 with 77.2 % sensitivity and 70.0 % specificity in discriminating HBV-related HCC from chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis. Our results suggest that serum miR-18a might serve as a novel and potential noninvasive biomarker for HBV-related HCC screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据