4.4 Article

Effect of Mosapride Combined with Esomeprazole Improves Esophageal Peristaltic Function in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Study Using High Resolution Manometry

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 1035-1041

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2430-y

关键词

Gastroesophageal reflux; Mosapride; Esophageal motility

资金

  1. Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co, Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whether addition of prokinetics to proton pump inhibitors improves esophageal peristalsis and symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of mosapride, a 5-HT4 agonist, and PPI cotherapy in patients with GERD on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry (HRM). This study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with GERD were allocated to a group either taking 40 mg esomeprazole plus 30 mg mosapride or taking esomeprazole plus placebo. Symptom assessment and the HRM study were conducted before drug treatment and after 4 weeks. Of 50 patients enrolled, 24 in the mosapride group (49 years old, 15 males) and 19 in the placebo group (43 years old, nine males) completed the study. Approximately 79 % of the patients had normal peristaltic function. Treatment response was not different between the two groups (79 vs. 68 %). Mosapride cotherapy tended to yield better response in patients with dyspepsia than those without dyspepsia (92 vs. 67 %). Lower esophageal sphincter pressure didn't change in both groups. Intrabolus pressure decreased in the mosapride group (3.4 +/- A 3.5 mmHg to 1.4 +/- A 4.1 mmHg, P < 0.05). Distal esophageal amplitude increased in the mosapride group and not in the placebo group (81 +/- A 34 to 89 +/- A 29 mmHg vs. 82 +/- A 32 to 83 +/- A 31 mmHg). Adding mosapride on esomeprazole improved esophageal contractability and lowered intrabolus pressure in patients with GERD. Mosapride and esomeprazole cotherapy tended to yield better response in patients with concomitant dyspepsia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据