4.4 Article

Bifidobacterium adolescentis Supplementation Ameliorates Parenteral Nutrition-Induced Liver Injury in Infant Rabbits

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 55, 期 10, 页码 2814-2820

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-1101-0

关键词

Bifidobacterium; Bacterial translocation; Parenteral nutrition; Liver injury

资金

  1. Foundation of National Natural Science of China [32071305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parenteral nutrition (PN)-induced liver injury is associated with gut atrophy, and probiotics have demonstrated the ability to stabilize the intestinal microecosystem and offer protection against bacterial translocation from the gut to the liver. Therefore, we hypothesized that enteral Bifidobacterium supplements could alleviate PN-associated liver injury. Three-week-old New Zealand rabbits were divided into three groups: control, PN, and PN + Bif group (PN plus enteral feeding 0.5 x 10(8) Bifidobacterium adolescentis per day). After 10 days, serum levels of liver enzyme and endotoxin were measured, and histology of liver and ileum were performed. Blood and homogenized samples of tissue from the mesenteric lymph nodes, lung, and spleen were cultured for detecting bacteria translocation. Intestinal permeability was determined by sugar absorption test. Serum levels of total bilirubin and bile acid were found to be lower in the PN + Bif group, with considerably improved ileum and liver histology (vs. the PN group). The bacterial translocation rate (15.6%), serum endotoxin level (0.11 +/- A 0.03 EU/ml), and lactulose/mannitol ratio (0.02 +/- A 0.004) in the PN + Bif group were obviously lower than those of PN group (77.5%, 0.60 +/- A 0.09 EU/ml, and 0.038 +/- A 0.008, respectively) and similar to those of the control group (2.8%, 0.09 +/- A 0.03 EU/ml, and 0.019 +/- A 0.005, respectively). Enteral probiotic supplementation could reduce gut permeability, bacterial translocation and endotoxemia, and thus attenuate PN-associated gut and liver injuries in infant rabbits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据