4.5 Article

Capsule endoscopy to detect primary tumour site in metastatic neuroendocrine tumours

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 1038-1042

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.07.004

关键词

Neoplasm; Neuroendocrine tumour; Small bowel; Unknown primary; Video capsule endoscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours, primary tumour localisation is often difficult with morphological and/or functional imaging. Although utilised in investigating various small bowel pathologies, evidence for using video capsule endoscopy to identify suspected small bowel primaries in patients exhibiting metastatic neuroendocrine tumours is limited. Aims: To assess the role of video capsule endoscopy in locating primary small bowel neuroendocrine tumours when conventional imaging fails to identify the origin of metastatic disease. Methods: We retrospectively compared our institutional database of patients presenting with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours between January 2010 and December 2013 with an analogous database of patients undergoing video capsule endoscopy for various indications. Patients whose primary tumours were not located radiologically and also underwent capsule endoscopy were identified. Results: 390 patients with metastasised neuroendocrine tumours presented within the study period. In 11 (2.8%) the primary tumour was not located radiologically. Video capsule endoscopy identified lesions suggestive of small bowel primary in 8/10 patients in whom it was successful. Small bowel primary was confirmed by histological analysis of surgical specimens. Conclusions: Our study supports the use of video capsule endoscopy as part of the diagnostic work-up in selected patients presenting with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours of unknown primary. The clinical utility of this technology requires clearer definition. (C) 2014 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据