4.5 Article

Prolonged thioguanine therapy is well tolerated and safe in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 110-115

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.07.004

关键词

Inflammatory bowel disease; Safety; Thiopurines; Tolerability

资金

  1. HLW pharma bv, Helmond, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Thioguanine has been used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, in particular for patients who failed conventional thiopurine therapy. To date, thioguanine has been infrequently studied in ulcerative colitis. Aim: To evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of thioguanine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Methods: A database analysis was performed on inflammatory bowel disease patients who had failed conventional thiopurine therapy and were treated with thioguanine. Rates and reasons for treatment failure were assessed. Laboratory values, abdominal ultrasonography, liver biopsy and endoscopic remission rates were evaluated. Results: Forty-six patients were included and median treatment duration was 22 months (range 0.3-72.0). Nine patients failed thioguanine therapy: six due to adverse events, three due to therapy resistance. Concomitant treatment with aminosalicylates protected against thioguanine failure (hazard ratio (HR) 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.48). When performed, ultrasonography (n = 21) revealed no suspected therapy-related pathology in all but one patient, in whom hepatomegaly was observed. Liver histology (n = 12) predominantly revealed no abnormalities (n = 4) or non-specific regeneration (n = 4); none showed nodular regenerative hyperplasia. At follow-up, 40% of colonoscopies revealed endoscopic remission as compared with 10% at baseline (P=0.180). Conclusions: Long-term use of thioguanine appears to be well tolerated and relatively safe in ulcerative colitis patients who failed conventional thiopurine therapy. (C) 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据