4.5 Article

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: Presentation, response to therapy, and outcome

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 439-443

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.11.007

关键词

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; Acid hypersecretion; Gastrinoma; Lansoprazole; Multiple endocrine neoplasia

资金

  1. TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. (now a part of Takeda Pharmaceutical North America Inc.)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent series describing the clinical presentation, response to therapy, and long-term outcome of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are limited. Aims: To assess the clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Methods: Over a 20-year period, patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome were enrolled in a prospective trial evaluating the efficacy of lansoprazole. Following dose stabilization, patients were followed on a 6-monthly basis with interval history, physical examination, endoscopy with gastric biopsies, gastric acid analysis and laboratory studies. Results: 72 patients (mean age 54 +/- 12 years, % male 58%, % Caucasian 69%) were prospectively enrolled. The clinical presentation was stereotypical for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Symptoms had been reported for a median of 9 years prior to diagnosis. Cross-sectional abdominal imaging was often negative for demonstrable tumour. All patients had gastric acid hypersecretion controlled with variable doses of lansoprazole (median dose 60 mg/day, range 15-480 mg/day). The median survival from the time of diagnosis was 6.6 years; only two of 19 deaths were due to metastatic gastrinoma. Conclusions: The clinical presentation of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome was similar to prior reports. Acid hypersecretion was controlled in all patients with variable doses of lansoprazole. Long-term survival was principally related to underlying co-morbidity. (C) 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据