4.5 Article

Immunomodulatory effects of unselected haematopoietic stem cells autotransplantation in refractory Crohn's disease

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 43, 期 12, 页码 946-952

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.07.021

关键词

Crohn's disease; Immunomodulation; Refractory disease; Stem cells; Transplantation

资金

  1. Fondazione IBD Onlus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Autologous haematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT) has been shown to be effective in refractory Crohn's disease. Aim: We analysed the effects of HSCT on the immune response of patients treated for moderate-severe Crohn's disease, refractory or intolerant to multiple drugs. Methods: Unselected peripheral blood stem cells were collected after mobilisation with cyclophosphamide (CTX) and G-CSF. The conditioning regimen included CTX and rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Blood samples for immunological analyses were collected at baseline, after mobilisation, and 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation. Immunological analyses evaluated: (1) CD4(+)/CD25(high+)/FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (T-regs); (2) Toll-like receptor 2-(TLR2) and TRL4-expressing monocytes (CD14(+) cells); (3) IL-12, IL-10, TNF-alpha-production by mitogen-stimulated CD14(+) cells and IFN-gamma production by CD4(+) T cells. Immunological results were compared with healthy donors and associated with clinical and endoscopic response during 12 months of follow-up. Results: Overall, T-regs increased, whilst TLR4-expressing cells, as well as TNF-alpha and IL-10, all higher than healthy donors at baseline, significantly decreased after transplantation. Full responders at T-3 had higher T-regs and lower IFN-gamma and IL12. T-regs decreased and IL12 and TLR2 increased in the only relapsed patient. Conclusions: HSCT can induce and maintain clinical and endoscopic remission in refractory Crohn's disease, which is associated with immunomodulation. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据