4.5 Article

IL-1β-511 and IL-1RN*2 polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease: An Italian population study and meta-analysis of European studies

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 179-184

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.06.016

关键词

Interleukin-1; IL-1 beta-511; IL-1RN*2; Polymorphism

资金

  1. Ateneo, Federato University La Sapienza Rome, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Several studies have tried to find possible associations between genetic polymorphisms and inflammatory bowel disease prevalence and/or phenotype. Our objectives were to test the frequency and phenotypic association of two polymorphisms of the interleukin-1 pathway, IL-1 beta-511 and IL-1RN*2, in inflammatory bowel disease patients and controls from all Italian Population, and to compare our data with previously published similar studies in Europe. Methods: We screened 290 inflammatory bowel disease patients (178 ulcerative colitis and 112 Crohn's disease) and 106 controls for IL-1 beta-511 and IL-1RN*2 polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. The prevalence of the IL-1 beta-511 and IL-1RN*2 polymorphisms in European inflammatory bowel disease patients Was Calculated by a meta-analysis of previously published studies using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: No correlation between the IL-1 polymorphisms and inflammatory bowel disease prevalence was found in our study Population. Crohn's disease patients with the IL-1 beta-511 mutation had a higher rate of complicated disease. A trend for an association between the IL-1RN*2 mutation and a higher risk for inflammatory bowel disease has been found only in Studies with Northern European Populations. Conclusions: The IL-1 beta-511 mutation can be associated with complex disease behaviour in Italian Crohn's disease patients. The IL-1RN*2 Mutation may play a role in Northern European people with inflammatory bowel disease. (C) 2009 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据