4.5 Article

The dyspeptic macrophage 30 years later: An update in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 166-168

出版社

PACINI EDITORE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.09.012

关键词

Autophagy; Crohn's disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; Macrophages

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alterations in autophagy leading to a defective intracellular response to low-level invasive bacteria are considered a major recent advance in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease. A genome-wide association study has shown an association of Crohn's disease with the autophagy related 16-like 1 gene. A second autophagy gene, the immunity-related Guanosine triphosfatase, has also been found to be significantly associated with Crohn's disease. The enteric flora of Crohn's disease patients includes, more commonly than controls, strains of adherent/invasive E. coli. The high level of adherent/invasive E. coli colonizing the intestinal mucosa of patients with Crohn's disease strongly suggests that it may play an important role in the aetiopathogenesis of the disease. E. coli strains are able to cross the mucosal barrier, survive within macrophages and induce the secretion of TNF alpha and the formation of granuloma. Recently it has been clearly shown that Crohn's disease patients have a defective mucosal macrophage killing activity resulting in increased exposure to commensal bacteria and activation of T cells. However, the hypothesis of niacrophages dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease was already suggested in 1977 by M. Ward, who introduced the concept of the dyspeptic macrophage, consisting of an inability to degrade a variety of phagocytosed normal gut dietary and microbial luminal constituents. Defective autophagy and dyspeptic macrophages seems therefore indicate the same pathogenetic mechanism. What is really new is the demonstration that this impaired macrophage function is genetically determined. (C) 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据