4.5 Article

Genetic polymorphisms in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Interleukin-6-174G/C polymorphism is associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 41, 期 11, 页码 823-828

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.03.005

关键词

Genes; IL-6; Inflammation; Insulin resistance; Steatohepatitis; Steatosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Environmental and genetic factors play a role in the pathogenesis and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: In 114 subjects with NAFLD we report the prevalence and correlation with clinical parameters of three polymorphisms: interleukin-6 (-174G/C), plasma cell differentiation antigen (K] 21 Q) and microsomal transfer protein (-493G/T). In 59 biopsied patients with NAFLD the polymorphisms were also related to histological features. Results: IL-6 -174C variant was more prevalent (p<0.01) in NAFLD compared to controls. In the NAFLD group, C carriers had higher HOMA-IR and fasting insulin than G carriers (p<0.05). The prevalence of IL-6/C variant was higher (83%) in biopsied than in not biopsied subjects (66%) (p<0.05). In biopsied subjects, C carriers had higher HOMA-IR and fasting insulin (p<0.05) compared than those with G allele. The prevalence of IL-6 -174G/C polymorphism was significantly higher in NASH than in NAFLD (p = 0.048). At logistic regression analysis IL-6 -174C was an independent predictor of both NAFLD (OR 4.116, C.I. 1.126-15.048) and NASH (OR 7.035, C.I. 1.167-42.394). Conversely, the distribution of PC-1 and MTP polymorphisms was not significantly different compared to the control group, nor associated with clinical or histological characteristics. Conclusions: Our data suggest that IL-6 -174C genetic polymorphisms, involved in inflammation and insulin resistance, are associated with NASH. These data may contribute to the understanding of the genetic susceptibility to NAFLD. (C) 2009 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.I. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据