4.5 Article

Clinical and biological significance of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in colorectal cancer

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 116-122

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.07.315

关键词

Angiogenesis; Colorectal cancer; Lymphangiogenesis

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  2. Health Research Council in the South-East of Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are essential for tumour development and progression. However, in colorectal cancer (CRC), the relationship between angiogenesis and clinical outcome is controversial, and the prognostic significance of lymphangiogenesis is not well examined because of the lack of specific a marker for lymphatic vessels. Aims. To evaluate blood microvessel density (MVD) following the proposed standard method for MVD assessment given by the first international consensus and lymphatic vessel density (LVD), and investigate their clinicopathologic and biologic significance in CRC. Methods. MVD and LVD in primary tumours (n = 2 10), along with their corresponding adjacent normal mucosa (n = 105) and distant normal mucosa (it = 27) specimens, were immunohistochemically examined by using CD31 and D2-40 antibodies. Results. Both MVD and LVD were higher in tumour compared with the corresponding normal mucosa. In tumours, MVD was positively related to particular interesting new cysteine-histidine-rich protein (PINCH) expression (P = 0.006), but not with clinicopathologic variables. LVD, in both intratumoural and peritumoural areas of tumours, was reversely related to Dukes' stage. There was no association between MVD or LVD and patients' survival (P > 0.05). Conclusions. Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis occurred in CRC development, but were not related to CRC patient prognosis. PINCH may play a potential role in tumour angiogenesis. (C) 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据