4.3 Article

Patient Selection for Therapy Reduction after Long-Term Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment for Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease: Trial and Error

期刊

DIGESTION
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 85-90

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000345144

关键词

Proton pump inhibitor; Therapy reduction; Primary care; Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; Pantoprazole

资金

  1. AltanaPharma BV, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy reduction after long-term daily treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptomatology proves difficult in primary care practice. We aimed to identify patient and/or disease characteristics in long-term daily PPI users predicting a successful switch to less than daily therapy. Methods: GORD patients who after long-term continuous treatment were able to use less than a daily PPI dose in a placebo-controlled trial were compared to patients who persisted in a daily dosage with respect to general, lifestyle and quality of life characteristics (SF-36 Health Survey) as well as psychological factors (Symptom Check List 90), symptom control on daily PPI (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire), disease and medication history. Results: Adequate symptom control on daily PPI use and female gender were determinants of successful therapy reduction. A prediction rule including the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia vitality dimension and gender correctly predicted 64% of patients to both less than daily and sustained daily treatment (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.69). Conclusion: In the heterogeneous population of PPI users for GORD in primary care, no clinically useful, easily obtainable combination of patient characteristics was able to adequately predict eligibility for therapy reduction. Switching to less than daily therapy remains a process of trial and error in which motivation of the patient and support by the physician will be important factors for success. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据