4.3 Article

Selective Internal Radiotherapy with Yttrium-90 Microspheres for Hepatic Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Single Center Study

期刊

DIGESTION
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 137-142

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000209849

关键词

Neuroendocrine tumors; Liver metastases; Radioembolization; Selective internal radiation therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To assess prospectively the safety and efficacy of Yttrium-90 microspheres in patients with unresectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Materials and Methods: Microspheres were administered via a temporarily placed hepatic catheter. Patients were monitored prospectively. All patients were followed with laboratory and imaging studies at regular intervals to determine response rates. Toxicity and quality of life scores were measured. Results: Nine patients (7 female) with a mean age of 58.8 years were enrolled in this prospective trial. The mean tumor load was 58.8%. The estimated percentage shunting to the lungs on MAA scans was 5.04 +/- 2.4%. Visceral artery embolization of extrahepatic arteries before treatment was performed in 6 patients. The median dose of microspheres was 2.1 +/- 0.4 GBq. A total of 12 therapy sessions was performed. The mean follow-up was 21.7 months. Technical success was 100%. No major complications occurred. Survival rates were 100, 57 and 57% for 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Three months after SIRT therapy partial response (PR) was seen in 6 patients (66%). Calculated reduction of liver metastasis volume was 49%. In 3 patients (33%) stable disease was seen with a calculated tumor reduction of 13%. The estimated time to progression was 11.1 months. Conclusion: Radio-embolization with 90 Y microspheres is safe and produces high response rates even with extensive tumor replacement for up to 1 year. Acute and late toxicity was very low. Further investigations compared with other local ablative techniques is warranted. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据