4.3 Article

Polycistronic lentivirus induced pluripotent stem cells from skin biopsies after long term storage, blood outgrowth endothelial cells and cells from milk teeth

期刊

DIFFERENTIATION
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 101-109

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2013.01.001

关键词

Human induced pluripotent stem cell; Milk teeth; Blood outgrowth endothelial cells; Tissue storage

资金

  1. Netherlands Institute of Regenerative Medicine (NIRM) [FES0908]
  2. FP7(Industem)
  3. Smart Mix Program of the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs
  4. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  5. Else-Kroener Fresenius grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) requires the collection of donor tissue, but clinical circumstances in which the interests of patients have highest priority may compromise the quality and availability of cells that are eventually used for reprogramming. Here we compared (i) skin biopsies stored in standard physiological salt solution for up to two weeks (ii) blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs) isolated from fresh peripheral blood and (iii) children's milk teeth lost during normal replacement for their ability to form somatic cell cultures suitable for reprogramming to hiPSCs. We derived all hiPSC lines using the same reprogramming method (a conditional (FLPe) polycistronic lentivirus) and under similar conditions (same batch of virus, fetal calf serum and feeder cells). Skin fibroblasts could be reprogrammed robustly even after long-term biopsy storage. Generation of hiPSCs from juvenile dental pulp cells gave similar high efficiencies, but that of BOECs was lower. In terms of invasiveness of biopsy sampling, biopsy storage and reprogramming efficiencies skin fibroblasts appeared best for the generation of hiPSCs, but where non-invasive procedures are required (e.g. for children and minors) dental pulp cells from milk teeth represent a valuable alternative. (C) 2013 International Society of Differentiation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据