4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Microwave analysis of PACVD diamond deposition reactor based on electromagnetic modelling

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 19, 期 5-6, 页码 397-403

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2009.10.032

关键词

MW plasma reactor; Electromagnetic modelling; MW engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of high quality diamond films by microwave plasma assisted CVD, with rapid growth rates and good uniformity over large surfaces, requires perfectly optimized reactors from the microwave design point of view. Most MW plasma assisted CVD reactors used for diamond film deposition work on the resonant cavity principle. The design of such reactors relies on 3 choices: i) choice of a suitable resonant mode (i.e. with an electric field structure conducive to plasma ignition), ii) choice of a MW coupling system to excite the cavity, and iii) choice of a quartz window to delimit a reduced pressure zone inside the cavity, so as to obtain the plasma in front of the substrate [1]. In this paper, we present an analysis method for MW plasma reactors relying on EM modelling, which allows for the identification of a resonant mode responsible for plasma ignition, applied to an existing reactor exhibiting plasma instabilities and requiring constant supervision. This analysis method, which can be generalised to any resonant cavity reactor, can describe the device behaviour (shape and location of the plasma, occurrence of instabilities) as a function of the various cavity geometrical configurations and to get a first estimate of the process performance. On the basis of such an analysis, it was possible to propose modifications to the reactor considered in order to improve process stability, and obtain higher growth rates. First growth tests done on diamond mono- and nano-crystalline films show excellent material quality and an increase in growth rate by more than an order of magnitude. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据