4.3 Article

Is prediffusion test an alternative to improve accuracy in screening hVISA strains and to detect susceptibility to glycopeptides/lipopeptides?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.04.008

关键词

MRSA; Vancomycin resistance; Heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate; Staphylococcus aureus

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnologico
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The characterization of heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains (hVISA) is even more challenging, as no routine standardized laboratory methods are available. A total of 124 S. aureus isolates recovered from inpatients attended in hospitals of Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil, were evaluated. The MIC of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin was determined by Etest and prediffusion tests using NeoSensitabse (R) tablets. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MICs: 0.5-3 mu g/mL) by Etest However, according to prediffusion test, 17 isolates presented reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, and of these, 12 were confirmed as hVISA using populational analysis. Considering daptomycin, prediffusion results were in agreement with susceptibility data (MICs), as all isolates were susceptible. Considering that characterizing hVISA is challenging and that MIC determination is not adequate to characterize this phenotype, prediffusion test was a viable alternative to screening hVISA and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. It was simple and low cost, with accuracy comparable to other well-established methods. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据