4.3 Article

In vitro activity of isavuconazole against 208 Aspergillus flavus isolates in comparison with 7 other antifu.ngal agents: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.08.006

关键词

Antifungal susceptibility; Aspergillus flavus; EUCAST; Wild-type cut-off value

资金

  1. Gilead
  2. Janssen Pharmaceutica
  3. Merck
  4. Pfizer
  5. Schering-Plough
  6. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspergillus flavus is the second most common species causing invasive aspergillosis after A. fumigatus. In certain countries like India, Sudan, and Saudi Arabia, A. flavus is most frequently isolated from patients with fungal rhinosinusitis and endophthalmitis. A. flavus exhibit an increased resistance to antifungal agents compared to A. fumigatus. We determined the in vitro activity of isavuconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin against 208 isolates of A. flavus by the EUCAST method and compared with the results obtained by the CLSI method. Isavuconazole and voriconazole MICs were <= 2 mu g/mL in 99% and 95%, respectively. Posaconazole and itraconazole MICs were <= 0.5 and <= 1 mu g/mL, respectively, for all isolates. MICs of amphotericin B were >= 2 mu g/mL in 91%; 36% of them exhibited MICs of >= 8 mu g/mL. All echinocandins demonstrated good anti-A. flavus activity. The essential agreement of the MIC/MEC results by EUCAST with CLSI broth dilution method assessed at +/- 2 dilutions was good for itraconazole (97.8%), voriconazole (100%), posaconazole (98.3%), isavuconazole (98.9%), caspofungin (99.4%), and anidulafungin (100%), but poor for amphotericin B (53.5%) and micafungin (79.1%). (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据