4.3 Article

Extensively drug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan:: microbiologic characteristics, clinical features, and outcomes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.09.007

关键词

extensively drug resistant; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; infection; colonization; clinical features; outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A retrospective study was performed in a university-affiliated referral center from year 1999 to year 2004 to understand the trend of resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates associated with nosocomial infections and describe the emergence of an extensively drug-resistant S. maltophilia (XDRSM). A 49% increase in all types of nosocomial infections and an 85% increase in nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by S. maltophilia were noted over the 5-year period. Trends of resistance to 7 antimicrobial agents against S. maltophilia remained stable. Seventeen patients had positive cultures of XDRSM in the year 2004, including 6 with pneumonia and I with biliary tract infection, and the other 10 patients had XDRSM colonization. Twelve patients (70.6%) had positive cultures of non-XDRSM prior to the acquisition of XDRSM. The mortality rate of patients with XDRSM infection was higher than those with colonization (85.7% versus 10%, P = 0.004). XDRSM infection, presence of shock, and the number of dysfunctional organ systems at the time of XDRSM isolation were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05). Genotyping of the 17 XDRSM isolates revealed 16 different clones. All the isolates tested possessed class I integron and formed biofilms and melanin. The high genotypic heterogeneity among XDRSM isolates was indicative of the polyclonal nature of emergence of these resistant bacteria. Majority of patients had positive cultures of non-XDRSM prior to the acquisition of XDRSM, indicating that the use of antibiotics might have resulted in selection of XDRSM. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据