4.7 Article

Aberrant gut microbiota composition at the onset of type 1 diabetes in young children

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 57, 期 8, 页码 1569-1577

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-014-3274-0

关键词

Butyrate; Human Intestinal Tract Chip; Microbiota; Type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. Tampere University Hospital
  2. JDRF
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. European Commission (VIRDIAB Project, Quality of Life Programm) [KA2, QLK2-CT-2001-01910]
  5. European Union Seventh Framework Package FP7 (DIABIMMUNE project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis Recent studies indicate that an aberrant gut microbiota is associated with the development of type 1 diabetes, yet little is known about the microbiota in children who have diabetes at an early age. To this end, the microbiota of children aged 1-5 years with new-onset type 1 diabetes was compared with the microbiota of age-matched healthy controls. Methods A deep global analysis of the gut microbiota composition was established by phylogenetic microarray analysis using a Human Intestinal Tract Chip (HITChip). Results Principal component analyses highlighted the importance of age when comparing age-matched pairs. In pairs younger than 2.9 years, the combined abundance of the class Bacilli (notably streptococci) and the phylum Bacteroidetes was higher in diabetic children, whereas the combined abundance of members of Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa was higher in the healthy controls. Controls older than 2.9 years were characterised by a higher fraction of butyrate-producing species within Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa than was seen in the corresponding diabetic children or in children from the younger age groups, while the diabetic children older than 2.9 years could be differentiated by having an increased microbial diversity. Conclusions/interpretation The results from both age groups suggest that non-diabetic children have a more balanced microbiota in which butyrate-producing species appear to hold a pivotal position.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据