4.7 Article

A large multi-centre European study validates high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a clinical biomarker for the diagnosis of diabetes subtypes

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 2801-2810

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2261-y

关键词

Biomarker; High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hsCRP; Maturity-onset diabetes of the young; MODY

资金

  1. NIHR
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [81696]
  3. University of Bergen, Helse Vest, Innovest
  4. Research Council of Norway
  5. BITCET
  6. VEGA [2/0151/11]
  7. Oxford (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre
  8. European Community [HEALTH-F2-2008-223211, HEALTH-F4-2007-201413]
  9. Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalized Disease Prediction, Prevention and Care (LuCAMP)
  10. Danish Diabetes Association
  11. Danish Research Council
  12. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  13. Diabetes UK
  14. Medical Research Council [G0700222] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. National Institute for Health Research [DHCS/07/07/008] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. MRC [G0700222] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate molecular diagnosis of diabetes subtype confers clinical benefits; however, many individuals with monogenic diabetes remain undiagnosed. Biomarkers could help to prioritise patients for genetic investigation. We recently demonstrated that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels are lower in UK patients with hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha (HNF1A)-MODY than in other diabetes subtypes. In this large multi-centre study we aimed to assess the clinical validity of hsCRP as a diagnostic biomarker, examine the genotype-phenotype relationship and compare different hsCRP assays. High-sensitivity CRP levels were analysed in individuals with HNF1A-MODY (n = 457), glucokinase (GCK)-MODY (n = 404), hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4A)-MODY (n = 54) and type 2 diabetes (n = 582) from seven European centres. Three common assays for hsCRP analysis were evaluated. We excluded 121 participants (8.1%) with hsCRP values > 10 mg/l. The discriminative power of hsCRP with respect to diabetes aetiology was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve-derived C-statistic. In all centres and irrespective of the assay method, meta-analysis confirmed significantly lower hsCRP levels in those with HNF1A-MODY than in those with other aetiologies (z score -21.8, p < 5 x 10(-105)). HNF1A-MODY cases with missense mutations had lower hsCRP levels than those with truncating mutations (0.03 vs 0.08 mg/l, p < 5 x 10(-5)). High-sensitivity CRP values between assays were strongly correlated (r (2) a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 0.91, p a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 1 x 10(-5)). Across the seven centres, the C-statistic for distinguishing HNF1A-MODY from young adult-onset type 2 diabetes ranged from 0.79 to 0.97, indicating high discriminative accuracy. In the largest study to date, we have established that hsCRP is a clinically valid biomarker for HNF1A-MODY in European populations. Given the modest costs and wide availability, hsCRP could translate rapidly into clinical practice, considerably improving diagnosis rates in monogenic diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据