4.7 Article

INSGFP/w human embryonic stem cells facilitate isolation of in vitro derived insulin-producing cells

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 694-706

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2379-y

关键词

Diabetes; Gene targeting; GFP; Human embryonic stem cells; Insulin

资金

  1. Australian Stem Cell Centre (ASCC)
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia
  3. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  4. McEwen Centre for Regenerative Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aimed to generate human embryonic stem cell (hESC) reporter lines that would facilitate the characterisation of insulin-producing (INS+) cells derived in vitro. Homologous recombination was used to insert sequences encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) into the INS locus, to create reporter cell lines enabling the prospective isolation of viable INS+ cells. Differentiation of INS (GFP/w) hESCs using published protocols demonstrated that all GFP(+) cells co-produced insulin, confirming the fidelity of the reporter gene. INS-GFP(+) cells often co-produced glucagon and somatostatin, confirming conclusions from previous studies that early hESC-derived insulin-producing cells were polyhormonal. INS (GFP/w) hESCs were used to develop a 96-well format spin embryoid body (EB) differentiation protocol that used the recombinant protein-based, fully defined medium, APEL. Like INS-GFP(+) cells generated with other methods, those derived using the spin EB protocol expressed a suite of pancreatic-related transcription factor genes including ISL1, PAX6 and NKX2.2. However, in contrast with previous methods, the spin EB protocol yielded INS-GFP(+) cells that also co-expressed the beta cell transcription factor gene, NKX6.1, and comprised a substantial proportion of monohormonal INS+ cells. INS (GFP/w) hESCs are a valuable tool for investigating the nature of early INS+ progenitors in beta cell ontogeny and will facilitate the development of novel protocols for generating INS+ cells from differentiating hESCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据