4.7 Article

Diabetes mellitus, glycated haemoglobin and C-peptide levels in relation to pancreatic cancer risk: a study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 12, 页码 3037-3046

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2316-0

关键词

C-peptide; HbA(1c); Cohort study; Diabetes; EPIC; Pancreatic cancer

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [Graduiertenkolleg 793]
  2. WCRF-UK
  3. WCRF International [2009/39]
  4. European Commission
  5. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  6. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  7. Ligue Contre le Cancer
  8. Institut Gustave Roussy
  9. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale
  10. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (Inserm) (France)
  11. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  12. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  13. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  14. Hellenic Health Foundation
  15. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  16. Hellenic Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity (Greece)
  17. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC)
  18. National Research Council (Italy)
  19. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS)
  20. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR)
  21. LK Research Funds
  22. Dutch Prevention Funds
  23. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland)
  24. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  25. Statistics Netherlands (the Netherlands)
  26. Nordforsk, Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition and Health (Norway)
  27. Health Research Fund (FIS)
  28. Regional Government of Andalucia
  29. Regional Government of Asturias
  30. Regional Government of Basque Country
  31. Regional Government of Murcia
  32. Regional Government of Navarra
  33. ISCIII RETIC (Spain) [RD06/0020]
  34. Swedish Cancer Society
  35. Swedish Scientific Council
  36. Regional Government of Skane and Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  37. Cancer Research UK
  38. Medical Research Council
  39. Stroke Association
  40. British Heart Foundation
  41. Department of Health
  42. Food Standards Agency
  43. Wellcome Trust (UK)
  44. [ERC-2009-AdG 232997]
  45. Medical Research Council [G0401527, G0801056B, MC_U106179471, G1000143] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis There has been long-standing debate about whether diabetes is a causal risk factor for pancreatic cancer or a consequence of tumour development. Prospective epidemiological studies have shown variable relationships between pancreatic cancer risk and blood markers of glucose and insulin metabolism, overall and as a function of lag times between marker measurements (blood donation) and date of tumour diagnosis. Methods Pre-diagnostic levels of HbA(1c) and C-peptide were measured for 466 participants with pancreatic cancer and 466 individually matched controls within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate ORs for pancreatic cancer. Results Pancreatic cancer risk gradually increased with increasing pre-diagnostic HbA(1c) levels up to an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.33, 4.39 highest [>= 6.5%, 48 mmol/mol] vs lowest [<= 5.4%, 36 mmol/mol] category), even for individuals with HbA(1c) levels within the non-diabetic range. C-peptide levels showed no significant relationship with pancreatic cancer risk, irrespective of fasting status. Analyses showed no clear trends towards increasing hyperglycaemia (as marked by HbA(1c) levels) or reduced pancreatic beta cell responsiveness (as marked by C-peptide levels) with decreasing time intervals from blood donation to cancer diagnosis. Conclusions/interpretation Our data on HbA(1c) show that individuals who develop exocrine pancreatic cancer tend to have moderate increases in HbA(1c) levels, relatively independently of obesity and insulin resistance-the classic and major risk factors for type 2 diabetes. While there is no strong difference by lag time, more data are needed on this in order to reach a firm conclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据