4.7 Article

Tadalafil increases muscle capillary recruitment and forearm glucose uptake in women with type 2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 53, 期 10, 页码 2205-2208

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-010-1819-4

关键词

Glucose-lowering drugs; Endothelial dysfunction; Insulin resistance; Microdialysis; Phosphodiesterase-5

资金

  1. EFSD/Servier
  2. LUA/ALF
  3. Swedish Research Council [K2008-55X-15358-04-3]
  4. Swedish Diabetes Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that reduced synthesis of nitric oxide in endothelial cells, i.e. endothelial dysfunction, contributes to the impaired action of insulin in the vasculature of patients with type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether selective inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 by tadalafil has beneficial effects on peripheral microcirculation and glucose uptake in these patients. We enrolled seven postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and ten age-matched healthy women as controls in a placebo-controlled study to evaluate the acute metabolic effects of tadalafil. We performed microdialysis and blood flow measurements in muscle, and sampled arterial and deep venous blood before and after a single dose of tadalafil 20 mg or placebo. Circulating glucose and insulin levels, muscle capillary recruitment as reflected by permeability surface area for glucose (PS(glu)) and forearm glucose uptake were measured. In women with type 2 diabetes, but not in the control group, tadalafil induced increases in the incremental AUC for PS(glu) (tadalafil vs placebo 41 +/- 11 vs 4 +/- 2 ml [100 g](-1) min(-1), p < 0.05) and forearm glucose uptake (46 +/- 9 vs 8 +/- 4 A mu mol [100 g](-1) min(-1), p < 0.05). The variable that best predicted forearm glucose uptake was PS(glu), which explained 70% of its variance. However, fasting glucose and insulin concentrations were similar following treatment with placebo or tadalafil in the two groups. This study suggests that tadalafil evokes positive metabolic effects in insulin-resistant women with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据