4.1 Article

Factors Associated with Contraceptive Satisfaction in Adolescent Women Using the IUD

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.015

关键词

Intrauterine device; IUD; IUS; Adolescent; Satisfaction; Contraception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective: To estimate satisfaction and to identify factors contributing to an adolescent woman's satisfaction with the levonorgestrel-containing or copper intrauterine device (IUD). Design: Adolescent women presenting to an urban clinic within 1 month of IUD insertion completed survey questionnaires about prior use of contraception, gynecologic/obstetric history, and a pain scale. Participants were contacted at 3 and 6 months post-insertion to complete surveys regarding satisfaction with the IUD, their menstrual bleeding patterns, and pain and cramping due to the IUD. Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression were used for analysis. Setting: Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center in New York City. Participants: Seventy-nine adolescent women aged 15-24 y. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure: Satisfaction was measured at 3 and 6 months post-IUD insertion as a 10-point Likert item. Results: 82% and 76% percent of participants were available for follow-up at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Satisfaction with the IUD was high overall with 75.4% (49/65) of participants choosing a satisfaction rating of eight or higher on the 10-point scale at 3 months and 76.7 % (46/60) at 6 months. Prior history of pregnancy and selecting the levonorgestrel containing IUD were predictive of higher satisfaction at 3 months, but not at 6 months. Parity and prior use of contraceptive methods were not predictive of satisfaction. Conclusion: The finding of high satisfaction across participants supports the current recommendation for the IUD as a first-line contraceptive for adolescents. Nulliparous young women and those who are naive to contraception should be considered as candidates for the IUD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据