4.3 Article

Population response to information on reversibility of Type2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 e135-e138

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12116

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Following publication of the Counterpoint Study (on the reversibility of Type2 diabetes using a very low energy diet), the extent of public interest prompted the authors to make available, on a website, general information about reversing diabetes. Shortly thereafter, individuals began to feed back their personal experiences of attempting to reverse their diabetes. We have collated this information on the effects of energy restriction in motivated individuals with Type2 diabetes that has been achieved outside a research setting. Methods Emails, letters and telephone communications received between July 2011 and September 2012 were evaluated (n=77: 66 men, 11 women). Median diabetes duration was 5.5years (3months28years). Reversal of diabetes was defined as achieving fasting capillary blood glucose <6.1mmol/l and/or, if available, HbA1c less than 43mmol/mol (6.1%) off treatment. Results Self-reported weight fell from 96.7 +/- 17.5kg at baseline to 81.9 +/- 14.8kg after weight loss (P<0.001). Self-reported fasting blood glucose levels fell from 8.3mmol/l (5.933.0) to 5.5mmol/l (4.010.0) after the weight loss period (P<0.001). Diabetes reversal was considered to have occurred in 61% of the population. Reversal of diabetes was observed in 80, 63 and 53% of those with >20, 1020 and <10kg weight loss, respectively. There was a significant correlation between degree of weight loss and reported fasting glucose levels (Rs 0.38, P=0.006). Reversal rates according to diabetes duration were: short (<4years)=73%, medium (48years)=56% and long (>8years)=43%. Conclusion These data demonstrate that intentional weight loss achieved at home by health-motivated individuals can reverse Type2 diabetes. Diabetes reversal should be a goal in the management of Type2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据