4.3 Article

The experiences of children and their parents in paediatric diabetes services should inform the development of communication skills for healthcare staff (the DEPICTED Study)

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 1103-1108

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03292.x

关键词

children; patient experience; qualitative methods; teenagers; Type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. NIHR
  2. South East Wales Trials Unit
  3. Wales Assembly Government through the National Institute of Social Care and Health Research (NISCHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The aims of this study were to describe users' experience of paediatric diabetes services to inform development of an intervention to improve communication between staff and patients in secondary care within a wider study (the DEPICTED Study). Methods Methods adapted for paediatric settings were used to set up six audio-recorded focus discussion groups with a total of 32 participants. Transcriptions and notes were coded thematically (supported by NVivo software) and analytic themes developed with discussion between researchers. Results Three main themes developed: the lack of two-way conversation about glycaemic control in clinic settings; the restricting experience of living with diabetes; and the difficult interactions around diabetes the children had with their schools. Doctors in particular were seen as struggling to link these themes of everyday life in their consultations with children and their parents. Children felt marginalized in clinics, despite active involvement in their own blood glucose management at home. Conclusions Health professionals need to balance a requirement for good glycaemic control with realism and appreciation of their patients' efforts. There is a need for a systematic approach to consulting, in particular using agenda setting to ensure that the issues of both the patient and the professional are addressed. A framework for a conceptual approach is discussed. How a patient is involved is as important as what is communicated during a consultation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据