4.3 Article

High sodium and low potassium intake in patients with Type 2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 1401-1408

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03111.x

关键词

dietary potassium intake; dietary sodium intake; potassium; salt; sodium; type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Aims To document dietary sodium and potassium intake and adherence to the Australian National Heart Foundation (NHF) guidelines in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus attending an Australian tertiary referral and university teaching hospital. Methods In a longitudinal study, 24h urinary sodium (uNa), potassium (uK), creatinine (uCr), urea (uUrea) and glucose (uGlu) excretions, urine volume (uVol) and body mass index were recorded in 122 regular attenders over an 8 year period (2001-2008; mean of 1.9 samples/patient/year). In a cross-sectional study, the same measurements were recorded in patients providing urine samples in the month of June from 2001 to 2009 (782 patients, averaging 87/year). Results In the longitudinal study, uNa (mmol/24 h) was 170 +/- 53 (mean +/- SD) in males and 142 +/- 51 in females, whereas uK (mmol/24 h) was 75 +/- 22 in males and 62 +/- 18 in females. Once adjusted for insensible losses, only 3% of males and 14% of females met the NHF dietary sodium intake guidelines, and 14% of males and 3% of female patients met the NHF dietary potassium guidelines. Body mass index, uUrea, uVol and uGlu were independent predictors of uNa (adjusted r2 = 0.57, P < 0.0001). The mean intra-individual coefficient of variation of the corrected uNa was 21 +/- 1%. The cross-sectional study confirmed these findings, and no temporal trends were observed. There was no correlation with glycated haemoglobin to suggest natriuresis with hyperglycaemia. Conclusions Most patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus do not meet NHF sodium or potassium intake guidelines. A diet high in sodium and low in potassium may contribute to the development of hypertension and to resistance to blood-pressure-lowering therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据